JABALPUR, India, Dec. 1 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 31: 1. In all these writ petitions, a common question of fact and law is involved and therefore, they are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order. 2. A common grievance of the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions is with regard to grant of annual increment which became due on completion of one year's service before attaining the age of superannuation. In some of the cases, th...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 1 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 31: 1. In all these writ petitions, a common question of fact and law is involved and therefore, they are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order. 2. A common grievance of the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions is with regard to grant of annual increment which became due on completion of one year's service before attaining the age of superannuation. In some of the cases, th...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 1 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 31: 1. In all these writ petitions, a common question of fact and law is involved and therefore, they are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order. 2. A common grievance of the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions is with regard to grant of annual increment which became due on completion of one year's service before attaining the age of superannuation. In some of the cases, th...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 1 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 31: 1. In all these writ petitions, a common question of fact and law is involved and therefore, they are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order. 2. A common grievance of the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions is with regard to grant of annual increment which became due on completion of one year's service before attaining the age of superannuation. In some of the cases, th...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 31: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this revision has been filed under mistaken belief that against the impugned order of rejection of plaint, revision application is maintainable. 2. The true fact is that an appeal might have been instituted under Section 96 of the C.P.C. before the competent forum. As such, this revision petition is not maintainable. 3. Therefore, learned counsel for the pe...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 31: 1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:- a) for issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) upon the respondents to pay salary of the petitioner w.e.f. 11.3.2015 till the date of his retirement i.e. 31.7.2018 while the petitioner was kept waiting for posting without any fault on his part as the petitioner after completion of his Leave period, h...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 31: 1. Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at the outset, has submitted that the authorities have passed the order on the pending representation and as such, he intends not to press the instant writ petition. However, he has sought for liberty to challenge the decision so taken by the authority dated 21.10.2025. 2. There is no opposition on the part of the learned State Counsel. 3....
RANCHI, India, Dec. 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 31: Heard parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Cr.M.P. Permission is accorded. This Cr.M.P. stands dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Dec. 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 31: 1. The order dated 04.04.2025 reads as under:- "1. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. With a view to give an opportunity, put up this case after two weeks." 2. Today also nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the present Cr.M.P. stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Dec. 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 31: Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioner for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 675 of 2025 to its original file. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Cr.M.P. No. 675 of 2025 was dismissed for default. It is next submitted that due to inadvertence and mistake on the part of the conducting counsel, he could not appear before this Court when t...